Some of the things I have known, I have become a believer
but are not straight foward. One of the concepts that I would have like to have
been further discussed (Self-Fulfilling Prophecy). Exaggerated or distorted
expectations this is something that I have looked into dearly. While, facts are
not clear cut one may wonder what the matter really? What makes things around
us act a certain way? Furthermore, I would have like to see where this
discussion would have taken us. The blogs I believe would have been really fun
to read. Some would say this is not logical yet, it is a concept. This in fact
is out of the ordinary. Although, ordinary is usually straight forward with all
evidence pointing into one thing. While, that one thing can only be upon the logic.
How come we don’t focus on what we may not know? I am just saying this would be
really interesting and creative.
Introduction Comm. 41
Friday, December 7, 2012
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Dec 3 week Question 2
My
favorite thing was meeting my group over the phone; never done that with someone
or people I have never meet before. It just goes to show how innovative our
instructor Perez is. I have never though I would’ve taken a class like this
ever in my life. I didn’t think that I would get along with my group members
because of the fact I didn’t meet them. Well I had the best time with both of
my groups even though we got to a rough start on some instances. All in all, “What
team doesn’t have their rough times?” It is hard for me to say anything that
was my least favorite, yet I kind of would’ve loved someone to challenge my
blogs more. I love trading ideas or arguments. So, people who posted upon my
page mostly agreed. Although, thanks for those who posted anything upon my
page. I really love that you did that. What can improve… Maybe people posting
one comment on every classmate’s blog. That would be pretty much it. Fun class…
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Dec 3 week Question 1
When the opening the book THiNK there’s a statement of a
defense lawyer; “ who claimed that Adolf Eichmann was just following orders as
many people would do.” I was stocked and still am, because I never really
thought about people just following order which really create a new way of
looking upon things. Nothing has really opened my minded more than that defense
statement. I learned from this class how to analysis more life. Furthermore, I
have done so previously in life. Yet, the book ThiNK has really put things into
perceptive. I don’t think as I use too think, so it has helped me grow and
continue to grow. Yet, I always challenged the books I have read because in my
opinion, “What good does it do us if we don’t challenge the literature we read.”
I have always had an “abductive and inductive reasoning.” This would make me a
great lawyer but, I don’t think I will practice law. This book is great for the
most part. The course I definitely loved, instructor Perez you’re great. I
learned how to blog “innovation,” I love it. Thank you everybody!!!
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Nov. 18 Question 2
One of the great things of which I observed was a white
lion. I watched a television program in which people where saving white lions. The
program to save white lions; therefore, requesting philanthropy where there focus is upon. The group said
there was a declining and extinct “white lions.” They were doing research in
one instance. The research was they put out these six lion. Yet, the loins
where housed in captivity. This enables them to enter the wild life. The
surrounding of the white lion must be to his advantage. What I mean by
advantage is due to the camouflage. Therefore, it’s distinguish them to stand
out in it’s surrounding. Therefore, the white color does not blend in. I used
“Consistency with Well-Established Theories” which is in my writing. The
“Relevance to the problem Under Study” is that the phenomenon can’t co-exist in
its environment due to the lions color “white.” The testability was the
hypothesis that they can survive in the wild, yet the lion where release and
most of them starved. Thank you for your read…
Saturday, November 17, 2012
Horoscope???
I must say that horoscope is really followed amongst many.
In my opinion the prediction of my horoscope today is not accurate at all. While
it is not an opinion it is a stated fact about that it is not accurate in this
instance. I talked to someone about the horoscope which we talked how vague
they were. Therefore, the vaguer a horoscope usually is the more you can follow
into it. Also, creating in one’s mind to follow more. I consider the fact that I don’t know no one
with a new relationship. Yet, I would be truly happy for someone who is in a
relationship. I kept to myself which means I am not going out of my way to go
into someone’s life. This is surprising because I have yet to see this
happened. This brings curiosity to bring me to what they may have too brought.
I feel very strong. I kind of want to figure out if anyone is in a new
relationship. It’s not accurate…
Sunday, November 11, 2012
Question 3 week Nov. 5
Social Networking is the concept that I found useful or
interesting. Yet, I have considered the time spend on “Facebook,” I use too
spend long hours, I have deleted my account. Social Networking has its’ good
concepts as well as bad concepts. Social networks shape our lives in the
everyday.
Communication
in a well form is to think beforehand upon the message to send. This here take
critical thinking, the form of word or action upon a picture or words can be
permeate. Therefore, ones pictures or words can forever haunt them because they
don’t know how to think critically. Take for example, there was a lawyer
graduate who went to Jamaica to celebrate that she graduated. A big law firm
saw who a picture of her of her smoking a joint on Facebook. The really created
a bad reputation. While I believe Facebook is good we must think rationally.
There is family, friends, influences, ect… but we must be able to us reason for
post. Thank you…
Saturday, November 10, 2012
Week Nov. 5 Question 1
Today my worldviews are being constantly being shaped;
because there are different issues rising up. I have a basic openness to a
certain point. The openness to hear people out and welcome there opinion upon
certain matters. Yet, I usually will find people who contradict there own
notions. Take for example, last week we discussion regulation on commercial
upon the youth. On one side the statement of “Parents bear the primary
responsibility for feeding their children.” This is contradicts itself because
the parent in my opinion should take responsibility of what the child eats. I
usually find the definition of the word or words in the content. This helps me
decide which side I will stand upon. Yet, I sometimes try to find middle grown.
There
are times when one needs to see both side and say “okay” this works and that
doesn’t. Yet, taking a little from both sides. For example, one has to look all
over a law, we may have a vague concept yet someone else like Senators are
looking at all possibilities. These issue are tough to tackle. So, I use
inductive and abductive reasoning when middle ground has too be met. We can
learn from each other in all walks of life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)