Barak Obama may have opposed to legalizing same-sex marriage
on a federal level yet supports civil unions and equal rights for same-sex
couples. Whether, his beliefs are consistent in equal rights and opportunities
for all people, regardless of their sexual orientation. The Federal Supreme
court and civil court differs yet are similar in United States of America. From
civil court to State court and Federal court in general. The Federal Supreme
court may present a degree of Defense Of Marriage Act, which has an argument,
this is what the system is built on. Well, no court is really above the other.
The
federal level makes up the federal government to consist of the supreme law the
land. Furthermore, it inquires that all American states shall abide by Federal Constitution,
or Law. Civil law is amongst persons and organizations; as in this situation
same sex-marriage is someone’s legal status. Although, 38 states have adopted
constitution and/or law against same-sex marriage. Some of these states have
adopted “defense of marriage” meaning that marriage is defined as between a man
and a woman.
Six states
have created a legal statue which recognizes same-sex marriage. Although, at
the federal level does not recognizing that it is legal. Therefore, not giving
the full benefits the homosexual who get married. On the other hand, same-sex
marriage has been tried many time at the supreme level there seem to not be a
solution on how Federal law passing this law. While Obamas standing point may
seem like giving up; it may be for each state to choice how it interprets
same-sex marriage. There is not concrete evidence to why he chooses to agree
with same-sex marriage at civil level, rather than the federal level.
While
each state has its own Pro-life and Pro-choice majorities vote. The states are left with the fact of choosing
over same-sex marriage. Therefore, it is a capital issue, it takes same sex
couples to feel unequal. Barak Obama’s stand should be on the federal level
also.
No comments:
Post a Comment